Austria
MaintainingEuropeHigh income
Power #31 / 50Per-capita #21
Cognitive Power
31.8
of 100 · #31
CPI
31.8
CC
59.8
ADI
62.6
CDI
0.600
AIR
55.6
AIX
42.8
CRI
49.6
CM
48.3
CV
3.5%
Primary · absolute lens
Cognitive Power
31.8 · #31/50
Total national capacity, AI capital, compute, models & robotics. Strongest in semiconductor capability, robotics & automation, economic mass.
Per-capita lens
Cognitive Coefficient
59.8 · #21/50
How deep infrastructure runs per person, rewards intensity, like GDP-per-capita or the HDI.
Agentic Deployment Index, the army of agents
Austria's agentic capacity
62.6
ADI · #22/50
How many capable, autonomous agents this society can field, how intelligent they are, and what they are permitted to do, across citizens, business and government. An automated army of agentic problem-solvers may be the single clearest near-term lever of cognitive advantage.
Agent capability (intelligence)72.0
Access, citizens62.0
Autonomy & reach (what agents can do)68.0
Business deployment50.0
Government deployment54.0
CC projection to 2040, Baseline
All 8 scenarios →Monte-Carlo band (P10-P90) around the median path. Dashed = illustrative historical reconstruction.
Median (P50)P10-P90 bandReconstruction
Pillar profile
Country report · generated from Austria's indices & economy
Austria, cognitive standing in full
Austria is the world's #29 economy by GDP ($580bn) and ranks #31/50 on absolute Cognitive Power and #21/50 on per-capita intensity. No index ranks as a clear strength across the headline indices; its trajectory is Maintaining, holding position but not compounding an advantage. It carries no single binding weakness across the headline indices.
Economic & scale context
The economic base AI capacity is built on, and how its scale interacts with the cognitive indices.
GDP (total)
$580bn
#29 of 50
GDP / capita
$76,778
High income · PPP
Population
9M
AI investment
$1.0bn
#28 globally
R&D intensity
3.20%
of GDP
Index-by-index read
For each index: what it means when high (the value) versus low (the risk), and Austria's own standing.
| Index | Value | Standing | What a high vs low value means, and where Austria sits |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPI Cognitive Power Index | 31.8 | Moderate · #31/50 | Mid-pack. High would mean great-power scale: the country can shape the frontier, attract capital and talent, and set standards others follow; low would mean limited absolute weight: a price-taker that depends on capacity built elsewhere. ▲ high: great-power scale: the country can shape the frontier, attract capital and talent, and set standards others follow · ▼ low: limited absolute weight: a price-taker that depends on capacity built elsewhere |
| CC Cognitive Coefficient | 59.8 | Moderate · #21/50 | Mid-pack. High would mean deep capability per person: broad productivity gains and a well-equipped workforce; low would mean thin per-person depth: gains stay concentrated and most of the workforce is under-equipped. ▲ high: deep capability per person: broad productivity gains and a well-equipped workforce · ▼ low: thin per-person depth: gains stay concentrated and most of the workforce is under-equipped |
| ADI Agentic Deployment Index | 62.6 | Moderate · #22/50 | Mid-pack. High would mean an automated-agent workforce multiplier is already in place across society; low would mean agents are under-deployed, the clearest near-term productivity lever is being left on the table. ▲ high: an automated-agent workforce multiplier is already in place across society · ▼ low: agents are under-deployed, the clearest near-term productivity lever is being left on the table |
| CDI Cognitive Development Index | 0.600 | Moderate · #20/50 | Mid-pack. High would mean broad, balanced development with no single dimension dragging it down; low would mean imbalance or underdevelopment, at least one dimension is a binding weakness. ▲ high: broad, balanced development with no single dimension dragging it down · ▼ low: imbalance or underdevelopment, at least one dimension is a binding weakness |
| AIR AI Readiness | 55.6 | Moderate · #20/50 | Mid-pack. High would mean institutions and infrastructure are ready to convert capability into real deployment; low would mean governance, data or infrastructure gaps will slow how fast AI can actually be used. ▲ high: institutions and infrastructure are ready to convert capability into real deployment · ▼ low: governance, data or infrastructure gaps will slow how fast AI can actually be used |
| AIX Augmentation Index | 42.8 | Moderate · #23/50 | Mid-pack. High would mean AI is actively in use across the workforce, so capability is being turned into value; low would mean access without adoption, the tools exist but are under-used, so the value is unrealised. ▲ high: AI is actively in use across the workforce, so capability is being turned into value · ▼ low: access without adoption, the tools exist but are under-used, so the value is unrealised |
| CRI Cognitive Resilience Index | 49.6 | Moderate · #19/50 | Mid-pack. High would mean strategic autonomy: a broad home-grown base that is hard to cut off or coerce; low would mean dependency risk: heavy reliance on frontier infrastructure others control, a strategic vulnerability. ▲ high: strategic autonomy: a broad home-grown base that is hard to cut off or coerce · ▼ low: dependency risk: heavy reliance on frontier infrastructure others control, a strategic vulnerability |
| CM Cognitive Momentum | 48.3 | Moderate · #18/50 | Mid-pack. High would mean investment and pipeline favour sustained improvement, today's position is likely to compound; low would mean a weak pipeline, the current position may stall or erode without new investment. ▲ high: investment and pipeline favour sustained improvement, today's position is likely to compound · ▼ low: a weak pipeline, the current position may stall or erode without new investment |
| CV Cognitive Velocity | 3.5% | Moderate · #16/50 | Mid-pack. High would mean improving quickly relative to a moving frontier; low would mean slow improvement, at risk of drifting backwards in relative terms as the frontier advances. ▲ high: improving quickly relative to a moving frontier · ▼ low: slow improvement, at risk of drifting backwards in relative terms as the frontier advances |
Trajectory & growth potential
Trajectory & growth potential
MaintainingAustria's trajectory is Maintaining, holding position but not compounding an advantage. Risk: the frontier keeps moving, so standing still means slow relative decline. A stable base, but it needs fresh momentum to avoid drifting back.
Momentum (CM): 48.3 #18/50
Velocity (CV): 3.5% #16/50
Closing the gap: -1.38 pts/yr vs the frontier
Projected CC by 2040: 79.2 (now 59.8, P50 · scenario not forecast)
Strengths to build on
- No standout strengths across the headline indices yet.
Risk factors
- Relative trajectory, Maintaining: Risk: the frontier keeps moving, so standing still means slow relative decline. A stable base, but it needs fresh momentum to avoid drifting back.
- Utilization lags even modest readiness, AIR 55.6 but AIX 42.8: take-up trails what the country's (still limited) readiness would support, so even the available capacity is not converting to value.
- Affluent but under-utilizing, a high-income economy (GDP/cap $76,778 PPP) whose AI utilization (AIX 42.8) lags its means.
Recommended priorities
- Prioritise the weakest pillar (Compute) to lift the geometric-mean development index (CDI).
- Convert access into utilization: workforce AI-skilling and agentic-workflow adoption.
- Broaden the base (education + data governance) to raise resilience and reduce concentration risk.
▲
These are model outputs and scenarios, not forecasts of actual outcomes. This platform measures access to, utilization of, and leverage from cognitive infrastructure, not intelligence. No causality or certainty is claimed.