CognitiveCoefficient
Detail
Join free

David Lammy

All people
Influence report · generated from David Lammy's indicators

David Lammy, full AI read

David Lammy, Deputy Prime Minister of the United Kingdom (United Kingdom), ranks #374/500 on the Power & Influence Index (46.1). Greatest lever: Political power (70.0, Strong). Entrenchment 54/100.

Role
Deputy Prime Minister of the United Kingdom
Country
United Kingdom
Category
Head of state/govt
Net worth / capital
-
Controls
Government, foreign policy, justice, transatlantic relations

Dimension read

DimensionValueStandingWhat a high vs low value means, and where David Lammy sits
PII Power & Influence (PII)46.1Moderate · #371/635Mid-pack. High would mean near the apex of civilizational influence; low would mean lower relative influence within this elite set.
▲ high: near the apex of civilizational influence  ·  ▼ low: lower relative influence within this elite set
Economic power Economic power50.0Developing · #445/635Low here, limited economic control.
▲ high: controls vast wealth and companies  ·  ▼ low: limited economic control
Political power Political power70.0Strong · #67/635High here, commands states, law or policy.
▲ high: commands states, law or policy  ·  ▼ low: little formal political power
AI power AI power18.0Developing · #496/635Low here, limited sway over AI's direction.
▲ high: shapes or controls the trajectory of AI  ·  ▼ low: limited sway over AI's direction
Platform reach Platform reach52.0Moderate · #281/635Mid-pack. High would mean commands a vast audience or network; low would mean limited direct reach.
▲ high: commands a vast audience or network  ·  ▼ low: limited direct reach
Institutional control Institutional control72.0Moderate · #257/635Mid-pack. High would mean controls pivotal institutions and capital; low would mean limited institutional control.
▲ high: controls pivotal institutions and capital  ·  ▼ low: limited institutional control
Entrenchment / tenure Entrenchment / tenure54.0Developing · #523/635Low here, power is contingent, term-limited or contestable.
▲ high: power is locked in (indefinite or controlling stake)  ·  ▼ low: power is contingent, term-limited or contestable

Strengths

  • Political power (70.0, Strong), commands states, law or policy.

Risk factors

  • Contingent power (tenure 54): term-limited or contestable, influence may fade with office or markets.
These are model outputs and scenarios, not forecasts of actual outcomes. This platform measures access to, utilization of, and leverage from cognitive infrastructure, not intelligence. No causality or certainty is claimed.

AI worldview

Contingent / balancedconfidence 0.4

Ideas & positions

David Lammy, as Deputy Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, has not extensively detailed his views on AI in the public domain. However, he has emphasized the importance of ethical AI and the need for robust regulation to ensure that AI technologies benefit society. He has called for transparency and accountability in AI systems, particularly in areas such as criminal justice and public services. While he has not explicitly addressed existential risk, open vs closed models, or specific regulatory frameworks, his focus on ethical and fair use suggests a cautious approach to AI development.

What shapes the view

Lammy's views on AI are likely shaped by his background in law and his experience with issues of social justice and inequality. His emphasis on regulation and ethical considerations reflects a broader political stance that favors government intervention to protect citizens and ensure equitable outcomes. His work on criminal justice reform and his advocacy for marginalized communities suggest that he is concerned about the potential for AI to exacerbate existing inequalities.

The AI-powered future they see

Lammy has not provided detailed predictions about an AI-powered future, but his public statements indicate that he sees AI as a tool that can enhance public services and improve efficiency, provided it is developed and deployed ethically. He warns against the risks of bias and discrimination in AI systems and advocates for policies that ensure these technologies serve the public good.

DystopianContingentUtopian
An AI-generated synthesis of the public record (statements, essays, interviews, papers), not statements by the person; positions evolve and the model's knowledge has a cutoff.