CognitiveCoefficient
Detail
Join free
Overview / Rankings / AI Influencers 500 / Sergei Naryshkin

Sergei Naryshkin

All people
Influence report · generated from Sergei Naryshkin's indicators

Sergei Naryshkin, full AI read

Sergei Naryshkin, Director, Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) (Russia), ranks #286/500 on the Power & Influence Index (49.1). Greatest lever: Political power (70.0, Strong). Entrenchment 70/100.

Role
Director, Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR)
Country
Russia
Category
Defense & intelligence
Net worth / capital
-
Controls
Foreign intelligence, covert influence operations, Putin loyalist network

Dimension read

DimensionValueStandingWhat a high vs low value means, and where Sergei Naryshkin sits
PII Power & Influence (PII)49.1Moderate · #286/635Mid-pack. High would mean near the apex of civilizational influence; low would mean lower relative influence within this elite set.
▲ high: near the apex of civilizational influence  ·  ▼ low: lower relative influence within this elite set
Economic power Economic power35.0Lagging · #571/635Low here, limited economic control.
▲ high: controls vast wealth and companies  ·  ▼ low: limited economic control
Political power Political power70.0Strong · #67/635High here, commands states, law or policy.
▲ high: commands states, law or policy  ·  ▼ low: little formal political power
AI power AI power54.6Moderate · #243/635Mid-pack. High would mean shapes or controls the trajectory of AI; low would mean limited sway over AI's direction.
▲ high: shapes or controls the trajectory of AI  ·  ▼ low: limited sway over AI's direction
Platform reach Platform reach30.0Lagging · #566/635Low here, limited direct reach.
▲ high: commands a vast audience or network  ·  ▼ low: limited direct reach
Institutional control Institutional control72.0Moderate · #257/635Mid-pack. High would mean controls pivotal institutions and capital; low would mean limited institutional control.
▲ high: controls pivotal institutions and capital  ·  ▼ low: limited institutional control
Entrenchment / tenure Entrenchment / tenure70.0Moderate · #192/635Mid-pack. High would mean power is locked in (indefinite or controlling stake); low would mean power is contingent, term-limited or contestable.
▲ high: power is locked in (indefinite or controlling stake)  ·  ▼ low: power is contingent, term-limited or contestable

Strengths

  • Political power (70.0, Strong), commands states, law or policy.

Risk factors

  • Significant but balanced influence with no single dominant lever.
These are model outputs and scenarios, not forecasts of actual outcomes. This platform measures access to, utilization of, and leverage from cognitive infrastructure, not intelligence. No causality or certainty is claimed.

AI worldview

Contingent / balancedconfidence 0.3

Ideas & positions

Sergei Naryshkin has not made extensive public statements on AI, but his few comments suggest a focus on the strategic and security implications of AI for Russia. He has emphasized the importance of AI in enhancing the capabilities of intelligence services and maintaining national security. Naryshkin has not explicitly addressed existential risk, open vs closed models, or specific regulatory frameworks for AI.

What shapes the view

Naryshkin's views on AI are shaped by his role in the Russian intelligence community and his loyalty to the Putin administration. His focus is on how AI can be leveraged to strengthen Russia's geopolitical position and counter Western influence. The emphasis on national security and technological sovereignty reflects broader Russian strategic interests.

The AI-powered future they see

Naryshkin predicts that AI will play a crucial role in future intelligence operations and military capabilities. He promotes the idea that Russia must develop and deploy AI technologies to remain competitive on the global stage. However, he has not provided detailed scenarios of an AI-powered future beyond these strategic contexts.

DystopianContingentUtopian
An AI-generated synthesis of the public record (statements, essays, interviews, papers), not statements by the person; positions evolve and the model's knowledge has a cutoff.