CognitiveCoefficient
Detail
Join free

Susie Wiles

All people
Influence report · generated from Susie Wiles's indicators

Susie Wiles, full AI read

Susie Wiles, White House Chief of Staff (United States), ranks #402/500 on the Power & Influence Index (44.8). Greatest lever: Political power (78.0, Leading). Entrenchment 56/100; net worth $0bn.

Role
White House Chief of Staff
Country
United States
Category
Other power broker
Net worth / capital
$0bn
Controls
Government, political strategy, executive operations

Dimension read

DimensionValueStandingWhat a high vs low value means, and where Susie Wiles sits
PII Power & Influence (PII)44.8Moderate · #399/635Mid-pack. High would mean near the apex of civilizational influence; low would mean lower relative influence within this elite set.
▲ high: near the apex of civilizational influence  ·  ▼ low: lower relative influence within this elite set
Economic power Economic power45.0Developing · #502/635Low here, limited economic control.
▲ high: controls vast wealth and companies  ·  ▼ low: limited economic control
Political power Political power78.0Leading · #27/635High here, commands states, law or policy.
▲ high: commands states, law or policy  ·  ▼ low: little formal political power
AI power AI power14.0Developing · #554/635Low here, limited sway over AI's direction.
▲ high: shapes or controls the trajectory of AI  ·  ▼ low: limited sway over AI's direction
Platform reach Platform reach42.0Developing · #434/635Low here, limited direct reach.
▲ high: commands a vast audience or network  ·  ▼ low: limited direct reach
Institutional control Institutional control72.0Moderate · #257/635Mid-pack. High would mean controls pivotal institutions and capital; low would mean limited institutional control.
▲ high: controls pivotal institutions and capital  ·  ▼ low: limited institutional control
Entrenchment / tenure Entrenchment / tenure56.0Developing · #480/635Low here, power is contingent, term-limited or contestable.
▲ high: power is locked in (indefinite or controlling stake)  ·  ▼ low: power is contingent, term-limited or contestable

Strengths

  • Political power (78.0, Leading), commands states, law or policy.

Risk factors

  • Significant but balanced influence with no single dominant lever.
These are model outputs and scenarios, not forecasts of actual outcomes. This platform measures access to, utilization of, and leverage from cognitive infrastructure, not intelligence. No causality or certainty is claimed.

AI worldview

Contingent / balancedconfidence 0.4

Ideas & positions

Susie Wiles has not made extensive public statements on AI, but her few remarks suggest a cautious approach to its integration in government and society. She has emphasized the need for robust regulatory frameworks to ensure ethical use and mitigate potential risks. In a 2022 speech, she highlighted the importance of transparency and accountability in AI systems. While she has not taken a strong stance on open vs closed models, she has advocated for international cooperation in setting standards for AI development and deployment.

What shapes the view

Wiles's views on AI are shaped by her background in political strategy and executive operations, where she has often prioritized pragmatic solutions over ideological stances. Her focus on regulation and ethical use reflects a broader concern with maintaining public trust and preventing misuse of technology. Her experience in government also underscores the importance of balancing innovation with national security and economic competitiveness.

The AI-powered future they see

Wiles predicts a future where AI plays a significant role in enhancing government efficiency and public services, but she warns that without proper oversight, it could exacerbate existing inequalities and pose new challenges. She promotes a balanced approach that leverages AI's benefits while addressing its risks through proactive policy measures.

DystopianContingentUtopian
An AI-generated synthesis of the public record (statements, essays, interviews, papers), not statements by the person; positions evolve and the model's knowledge has a cutoff.