CognitiveCoefficient
Detail
Join free

Tulsi Gabbard

All people
Influence report · generated from Tulsi Gabbard's indicators

Tulsi Gabbard, full AI read

Tulsi Gabbard, US Director of National Intelligence (United States), ranks #137/500 on the Power & Influence Index (57.5). Greatest lever: Political power (85.0, Leading). Entrenchment 48/100.

Role
US Director of National Intelligence
Country
United States
Category
Defense & intelligence
Net worth / capital
-
Controls
Oversight of 18 US intelligence agencies, signals intelligence, intel-AI fusion

Dimension read

DimensionValueStandingWhat a high vs low value means, and where Tulsi Gabbard sits
PII Power & Influence (PII)57.5Strong · #137/635High here, near the apex of civilizational influence.
▲ high: near the apex of civilizational influence  ·  ▼ low: lower relative influence within this elite set
Economic power Economic power35.0Lagging · #571/635Low here, limited economic control.
▲ high: controls vast wealth and companies  ·  ▼ low: limited economic control
Political power Political power85.0Leading · #11/635High here, commands states, law or policy.
▲ high: commands states, law or policy  ·  ▼ low: little formal political power
AI power AI power71.5Strong · #124/635High here, shapes or controls the trajectory of AI.
▲ high: shapes or controls the trajectory of AI  ·  ▼ low: limited sway over AI's direction
Platform reach Platform reach60.0Strong · #166/635High here, commands a vast audience or network.
▲ high: commands a vast audience or network  ·  ▼ low: limited direct reach
Institutional control Institutional control78.0Strong · #163/635High here, controls pivotal institutions and capital.
▲ high: controls pivotal institutions and capital  ·  ▼ low: limited institutional control
Entrenchment / tenure Entrenchment / tenure48.0Lagging · #592/635Low here, power is contingent, term-limited or contestable.
▲ high: power is locked in (indefinite or controlling stake)  ·  ▼ low: power is contingent, term-limited or contestable

Strengths

  • Political power (85.0, Leading), commands states, law or policy.
  • AI power (71.5, Strong), shapes or controls the trajectory of AI.
  • Institutional control (78.0, Strong), controls pivotal institutions and capital.

Risk factors

  • Contingent power (tenure 48): term-limited or contestable, influence may fade with office or markets.
These are model outputs and scenarios, not forecasts of actual outcomes. This platform measures access to, utilization of, and leverage from cognitive infrastructure, not intelligence. No causality or certainty is claimed.

AI worldview

Contingent / balancedconfidence 0.4

Ideas & positions

Tulsi Gabbard has not extensively detailed her views on AI in the public domain. However, during her tenure as a member of Congress, she emphasized the importance of ethical AI development and its integration into national security. She has called for robust oversight and regulation to ensure that AI technologies are used responsibly and do not infringe on civil liberties. Gabbard has also expressed concerns about the potential for AI to exacerbate economic inequality and has advocated for policies that address these issues. Her stance on existential risk is not well-documented, but she has generally supported a cautious approach to AI development.

What shapes the view

Gabbard's views on AI are shaped by her background in national security and her experience with technology policy. Her emphasis on ethical and responsible AI development reflects a broader concern with the impact of technology on society, particularly in terms of privacy and economic equity. Her political stance tends to favor government intervention to protect citizens and ensure fair distribution of technological benefits.

The AI-powered future they see

Gabbard predicts a future where AI plays a significant role in enhancing national security and improving public services, but she warns that without proper regulation, AI could lead to increased surveillance and economic disparities. She advocates for a balanced approach that maximizes the benefits of AI while mitigating its risks.

DystopianContingentUtopian
An AI-generated synthesis of the public record (statements, essays, interviews, papers), not statements by the person; positions evolve and the model's knowledge has a cutoff.